requestId:68518620e766d9.99812844.
The positioning of the natural law in Wang Yangming’s Philosophy
AuthorEnterprise conditions: Lu Yinghua (Teached by Huadong Teachers’ Sinian Advanced Humanities Research Institute and the Department of Philosophy)
Source: “Nanjing Social Sciences” Issue 8, 2021
Content Summary: Differences from Zhu Zi’s recognition of the connection between the natural law and the natural principle. Wang Yangming believes that the two have no essential connection. In the study of Yangming’s mind, reason is the law of nature, that is, the principle of moral value, which is presented through an objective value order. The relationship between the laws of nature and the confidant is the mutual design and determination of the relationship between the unitary discussion, rather than the transformation of the laws of nature as the confidant. The mutual generation of the two lies in the interaction of “guidance and direction” that appears in moral and emotional activities. A confidant is a specific and orderly activity of the mind in time, and also a clear observation of moral values. This is from the content. The laws of nature are the order of the activities of the mind and the value of morality revealed. This is from the perspective of emotion. The laws of nature guide the self-development activities of confidants, and confidants also point to and fulfill the laws of nature. Under this interpretation, the subject, body, and physical position of the confidant will no longer be in compliance with the law. In Wang Yangmingzhe’s learning, there is no transformation from “to speak the mind with the principles of nature” to “to speak the mind with the confidant”. In addition, the moral value connotation of the laws of nature also extends the moral norms, and its exploration shows the ability of the psychology to develop the standard and ethics. The moral principles laid out in turn can also help awaken confidants, or conceal the instinctive touch infection that confidants are infected.
Keywords: Heavenly principles; confidants; Wang Yangming; value; emotion; standardization
Shen Shanhong and Mo Ming believed that in his mature thinking, Wang Yangming replaced the “confidants” (the principle of the mind). [1] Yang Yang also advocated similar views, believing that “the development of “confidant” learning has experienced the process of using “nature principles” to refer to “confidant” and then using “confidant” to replace “nature principles”. [2] Others, some students also reminded Yang Ming to have a superior position in thinking about the principles of “recognizing the principles of heaven” and Yang Ming to “become a confidant” in thinking (especially in terms of kung fu theory). [3] Dunke Yan also advocated that “Wang Yangming regards the essence of the mind or the confidant as the law of heaven.” [4] It seems that Wang Yangming has reduced the law of heaven as a confidant, and has generally impersonated the law of heaven. The understanding of the one-cent theory of confidant also highlights the position of confidant’s subject, body and body.
Intellect, compared to middle-aged people advocating the “principle of mind” or “principle of mind”, Yangming later discovered more about learning “confidant” in theory and kung fu. However, the difference between the past and the future is actually a transition of thinking, or a continuation and deepening? Can a confidant swallow the law of nature? This question is also the key to understanding the entire state of thinking of the wise mind. In order to clarify this problem, we need to first evaluate the general characteristics of the concept of theory and the unique understanding of psychology..
1. The value and essence of the theory in the Yangming Heart School is . Through the comparison of the price ptt and science, the knowledge of “reason” in the Heart School will gain a clearer explanation. From the most general point of view, principles express the existence of situations, orders, rules, laws, fantasies, energy, morality, etc. beyond the pure field of experience. It is not as good as to keep a monthly price that can’t rely solely on the senses to grasp, but requires the leadership of sensuality and spirit. In the eyes of scientists, reason is not inextricably related to atmosphere; reason exists independently beyond experience, and reason itself cannot be experienced, it is before experience. In logic, reason precedes the atmosphere, pure principles are not pure and provide the basis for the norm and adjustment. Although the hearts at the four ends are aura, they are still good, because they are provoked according to the truth. And the seven emotions are confusing because they do not develop according to reason. Almost all thinkers believe that empathy is not rational, but in the eyes of psychologists, reason can be seen in person, or perhaps it is not essentially completely separated from experience. The personal experience does not need to be rational and personal experience, but it can also be energy-intensive. Therefore, according to the mind, the body has its own order, and the reason lies in the atmosphere, so there is the saying “principle” [5] and “the mind has its reason”. If we know that we are rational, then speaking of the original conscience of our hearts is not the atmosphere; and if we know that we are experienced, then speaking of the original conscience of our hearts is still the atmosphere-as for reasoning and the original conscience of our hearts are pre-designed and certified by each other, or physical and chemistry is the original conscience, so the mind learners have different opinions. [6]
In science, in general, reason is the same as the laws of nature. In terms of meaning, principles include the principles of heaven (the principle of one principle) and the principles of the whole (the principle of different). The former is the principle of value, expressing order and harmony; the latter is the principle of dealing with all things, expressing the characteristics and rules of various things – the general theory includes various types of humanities, social, and natural scientific knowledge. The order contains goodness, so it is said that the laws of nature are pure and good, and the nature of the six communes that correspond to them is also pure and good. The natural principles are regarded as composed of pure and pure laws of nature, and are no longer pure, and the corresponding temperament is not pure and good. They not only provide energy and set resistance for self-cultivation and virtue. [7] In terms of kung fu, the study of things must start from the specific natural principles, and then unintentionally extend a deep understanding of the law of nature to the male supporting role Xie Xi who was trampled by the male protagonist and stomped on stone. [8]
In summary, the connection between the principle of value and the principle of nature has been recognized by science. In clear contrast to this structure, Yangming Xinxue does not recognize the continuity and correlation between the two. Yangmingge bamboo”Well, Aunt Wu see you again.” The case of illness confessed to him, and there was no necessary connection between “a thing every day” and the “sudden communication” at a certain moment. The way of Yangming is not to establish the relationship between the two, but to no longer focus on the natural principles and directly investigate the principles of value. In fact, Yang Ming himself did not have the awareness of exploring the inner things for many years. In his early years, he was immersed in activities such as military sects and Buddhist masters, which were closely related to how to act and energy cultivation. Therefore, when Yang Ming was in the bamboo, he did not conduct verified observations through scientific methods, but he always focused on the problems of how to become a saint, and used a straightforward method. Without realizing the matter, you will have to come up with the conclusion that you are not prosperous in this way, which will also attract some criticism. But Yang Ming would not recognize this criticism: even if Zhuzi was scientifically clear about it, he would still deny this connection with moral character. In his opinion, inner virtue can provide power to inner knowledge, not the other way around.
To Yangming, reason is the law of nature, the principle of value. He said:
I love to ask: “‘Before you know the end, you will have a certainty’. Zhu Xi thought that ‘everything has a theorem’ is like being in conflict with the teacher’s words.” The teacher said: “To seek the best good in everything is beyond meaning. The best good is the essence of the mind, but it is just that the “clear virtue” reaches the “highest essence and oneness”. She has not left things, as the note says, “The protagonist is equal to the best of the laws of nature, but she is regarded as a perfect stone, and has no selfishness in all aspects.” (2 articles)
Yang Ming believes that on the one hand, the truth has not left things; on the other hand, the truth is not the truth of the things themselves. Compared with Zhu Zi’s emphasis on the principle of “things”, Yang Ming is more important to emphasize the “nature” behind the principle of “things” (3 articles). First of all, the principles of nature pre